Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper details the design, rationale, and implementation of a discipline-agnostic AI literacy course focused on AI-assisted literature review for upper-level undergraduates and graduate students. The course architecture comprises four modules: comprehension, knowledge taxonomy construction, gap identification, and literature review synthesis, each embedding verification disciplines and standardized AI attribution. Pre- and post-course surveys revealed significant gains in student confidence, particularly in hallucination detection, responsible AI use, and AI attribution.
A new AI literacy course demonstrably boosts students' confidence in critical areas like hallucination detection and responsible AI use, filling a crucial gap in training for AI-assisted research.
The rapid integration of generative AI into academic workflows demands curricula that equip students not only with tool proficiency but with the critical judgment to use those tools responsibly in scholarly work. Existing offerings cluster around two inadequate poles: technical AI development courses serving narrow specialist audiences, and brief general-literacy interventions that cannot develop the sustained, practice-based competencies rigorous research requires. This paper reports the design, theoretical rationale, and implementation of BSTA 495/395: Getting Started with AI-Assisted Research, developed and delivered at Lehigh University (Spring 2026). The course addresses an underserved gap: the competencies required for rigorous AI-assisted literature review. Its architecture organizes instruction into four sequential modules aligned with the cognitive demands of that task: comprehension of individual papers, construction and validation of knowledge taxonomies, identification of research gaps, and synthesis and production of complete literature reviews. Each module embeds an explicit verification discipline and standardized AI attribution practice. Prerequisite-free and discipline-agnostic, the course enrolls upper-level undergraduates and graduate students across all fields with differentiated assessment expectations. Pre- and post-course survey data from the inaugural offering indicate substantial self-reported confidence gains, with the largest in hallucination detection (d = +1.45), responsible AI use (d = +1.33), and AI attribution practice (d = +2.40), consistent with the course's design emphasis. The course constitutes a replicable model for the emerging genre of AI research literacy curricula.
