Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Field of Safe Motion (FSM), a quantitative safety model that determines if a driver has a collision-free escape route by considering their physical capabilities and the actions of other road users. It operationalizes the conceptual Field of Safe Travel (FST) framework by integrating it with reachability analysis, providing a computational tool for assessing driving behavior. The authors demonstrate the FSM's applicability across various driving scenarios, highlighting its interpretability and reliance on a small set of basic assumptions.
Finally, a computational model quantifies driving safety by determining if a driver has a collision-free escape route, bridging a 90-year gap between theory and practice.
We present the Field of Safe Motion (FSM), a quantitative safety model for determining whether a driver maintains a collision-free escape route, or "out," at any given moment by accounting for that driver's physical capabilities and the foreseeable actions of other road users. The Field of Safe Travel (FST) provides a framework for representing the types of sensory information and actions available to drivers. However, the FST has remained conceptual in nature since its initial publication almost 90 years ago -- and a concrete computational operationalization is still lacking. At the same time, reachability analysis provides a quantitative basis for assessing the possible actions available to road users, using interpretable kinematic models, but reachability models have so far remained confined largely to the engineering and robotics literature. Bringing these two approaches together provides for an interpretable, quantitative tool for assessing driving behavior across a wide range of driving scenarios. Beyond being interpretable, our approach relies on a relatively small set of basic assumptions that are easy to enumerate and reason about. Furthermore, an interpretable reachability model paired with kinematic assumptions provides a way to bound uncertainty about road users' reasonably foreseeable future locations. We demonstrate the applicability of the FSM to different driving scenarios and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the model.
