Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the concept of "Epistemological Debt," which arises when engineers over-rely on LLMs for code verification, leading to a decline in their ability to perform root-cause analysis and understand system complexity. The authors argue that recursive training on AI-generated code further exacerbates this issue by homogenizing the software landscape and reducing the diversity needed for robust engineering. A case study of the 2026 Amazon outages illustrates how this "mechanized convergence" can lead to systemic fragility and widespread failures.
Over-reliance on AI code generation isn't just making developers lazy, it's creating a dangerous "Epistemological Debt" that could trigger systemic software failures.
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the software development lifecycle (SDLC) masks a critical socio-technical failure: Cognitive-Systemic Collapse. This paper introduces "Epistemological Debt," the hidden carrying cost incurred when engineers substitute logical derivation with passive AI verification. This debt erodes the mental models essential for root-cause analysis, widening the gap between system complexity and human comprehension. Furthermore, recursive training on synthetic code threatens to homogenize the global software reservoir, diminishing the variance required for robust engineering. Using the 2026 Amazon outages as a case study, this research illustrates how "mechanized convergence" leads to systemic fragility. To preserve long-term resilience, engineering leaders must move beyond prompt-based development to implement rigorous human-in-the-loop pedagogical standards. This framework balances AI-driven productivity with the epistemic sovereignty necessary to manage increasingly opaque software ecosystems.
