Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper re-evaluates the make-or-buy decision for enterprise software in light of recent advances in agentic AI coding systems. By combining transaction cost economics and the resource-based view, the authors analyze how AI impacts key decision determinants like cost, differentiation, and vendor lock-in. They find that while AI favors building for commodity utilities and differentiating custom applications, the "SaaSocalypse" narrative is overstated, as regulated and mission-critical systems still favor buying.
The rise of agentic AI coding systems doesn't spell the end for SaaS, but it *does* fundamentally alter the economics of building in-house, creating a hybrid governance model that blends code ownership with dependence on external AI infrastructure.
Advances in generative artificial intelligence, particularly agentic coding systems capable of autonomous software development, are disrupting the economics of the make-or-buy decision for enterprise applications. The "SaaSocalypse" narrative predicts that AI will render large segments of the Software-as-a-Service market obsolete by enabling firms to build software in-house at a fraction of historical cost. This paper adopts a conceptual research approach, combining transaction cost economics and the resource-based view with an assessment of current AI capabilities, to systematically re-evaluate the factors underlying the make-or-buy decision. It makes three contributions. First, it provides a factor-level analysis of how AI reshapes seven canonical decision determinants: cost, strategic differentiation, asset specificity, vendor lock-in, time-to-market, quality and compliance, and organizational capability. Second, it develops a typology of enterprise applications by their sensitivity to AI-induced shifts in make-or-buy economics. Third, it demonstrates that AI fundamentally transforms the governance properties of the Make option, shifting it from Williamson's pure hierarchy to a hybrid governance form that combines code ownership with external AI infrastructure dependency, with qualitatively different economics, capability requirements, and governance structures than pre-AI in-house development. The analysis finds that the SaaSocalypse thesis is overstated for most enterprise application categories; Make is most compelling for commodity utilities and differentiating custom applications in the AI era, while regulated and mission-critical systems remain predominantly in the buy domain.
