Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Agora-Opt, a modular agentic framework that leverages decentralized debate and a read-write memory bank to improve LLMs' ability to solve optimization modeling problems from natural language requirements. Multiple agent teams independently generate solutions, reconcile them through debate grounded in outcomes, and store solver-verified artifacts and disagreement resolutions in memory for future use. Agora-Opt outperforms strong zero-shot LLMs, training-centric approaches, and prior agentic baselines on public benchmarks, demonstrating robust gains across different LLM backbones and component variants.
Decentralized debate among LLM agents doesn't just select the best solution for optimization modeling; it structurally enables agents to refine flawed candidates and even recover correct formulations through interaction.
Optimization modeling underpins real-world decision-making in logistics, manufacturing, energy, and public services, but reliably solving such problems from natural-language requirements remains challenging for current large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we propose \emph{Agora-Opt}, a modular agentic framework for optimization modeling that combines decentralized debate with a read-write memory bank. Agora-Opt allows multiple agent teams to independently produce end-to-end solutions and reconcile them through an outcome-grounded debate protocol, while memory stores solver-verified artifacts and past disagreement resolutions to support training-free improvement over time. This design is flexible across both backbones and methods: it reduces base-model lock-in, transfers across different LLM families, and can be layered onto existing pipelines with minimal coupling. Across public benchmarks, Agora-Opt achieves the strongest overall performance among all compared methods, outperforming strong zero-shot LLMs, training-centric approaches, and prior agentic baselines. Further analyses show robust gains across backbone choices and component variants, and demonstrate that decentralized debate offers a structural advantage over centralized selection by enabling agents to refine candidate solutions through interaction and even recover correct formulations when all initial candidates are flawed. These results suggest that reliable optimization modeling benefits from combining collaborative cross-checking with reusable experience, and position Agora-Opt as a practical and extensible foundation for trustworthy optimization modeling assistance. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/CHIANGEL/Agora-Opt.
Tsinghua AI