Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This chapter synthesizes research on curiosity and metacognition, proposing a unified framework that posits curiosity as intrinsically linked to metacognitive monitoring and control. It reviews educational interventions designed to enhance curiosity, noting their variable effectiveness across learners and the need for personalized approaches. The chapter further addresses the impact of generative AI on curiosity-driven learning, suggesting strategies to leverage AI as a partner for epistemic development rather than a cognitive shortcut.
Generative AI, while offering personalized inquiry at scale, risks undermining curiosity-driven learning unless interaction modes are carefully designed to foster sustained epistemic development.
This chapter examines the relationship between curiosity and metacognition as critical drivers of autonomous and self-regulated learning. We synthesize recent research to propose a unified framework integrating behavioral, computational, and psychoeducational dimensions, arguing that curiosity, i.e. the intrinsic drive to acquire new knowledge, relies fundamentally on metacognitive monitoring and control. From an educational perspective, we evaluate interventions designed to enhance curiosity in classroom settings. While promising, our review indicates that these interventions yield mixed results, often proving differentially effective for struggling learners, thereby underscoring the necessity for approaches tailored to individual profiles. Finally, we address the paradigm shift introduced by Generative AI. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer unprecedented scalability for personalized inquiry, we argue that their default interaction modes pose significant risks to the dynamics of curiosity-driven learning. To mitigate these challenges, we review strategies to transform AI from a potential cognitive shortcut into a powerful partner for sustained epistemic development.
