Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper presents a large-scale cross-cultural study (n=4,641 across 7 countries) investigating the adoption and perception of LLMs for emotional support. The study identifies significant cross-country variation in adoption rates (20-59%) and reveals that demographic factors like age, religion, marital status, and socioeconomic status, along with cultural background, are strong predictors of positive perceptions towards LLM confidants. Analysis of 731 user prompts highlights common needs such as loneliness, stress, and relationship issues.
Turns out, your cultural background and socioeconomic status are better predictors of whether you'll trust a chatbot with your feelings than the chatbot's actual capabilities.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used not only for instrumental tasks, but as always-available and non-judgmental confidants for emotional support. Yet what drives adoption and how users perceive emotional support interactions across countries remains unknown. To address this gap, we present the first large-scale cross-cultural study of LLM use for emotional support, surveying 4,641 participants across seven countries (USA, UK, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, and The Netherlands). Our results show that adoption rates vary dramatically across countries (from 20% to 59%). Using mixed models that separate cultural effects from demographic composition, we find that: Being aged 25-44, religious, married, and of higher socioeconomic status are predictors of positive perceptions (trust, usage, perceived benefits), with socioeconomic status being the strongest. English-speaking countries consistently show more positive perceptions than Continental European countries. We further collect a corpus of 731 real multilingual prompts from user interactions, showing that users mainly seek help for loneliness, stress, relationship conflicts, and mental health struggles. Our findings reveal that LLM emotional support use is shaped by a complex sociotechnical landscape and call for a broader research agenda examining how these systems can be developed, deployed, and governed to ensure safe and informed access.
