Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors introduce SpeechParaling-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate paralinguistic awareness in Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs), featuring over 100 fine-grained features and 1,000 English-Chinese parallel speech queries across three tasks. They also develop a pairwise comparison pipeline using an LALM-based judge to mitigate subjectivity in evaluation. Experiments using SpeechParaling-Bench reveal that current LALMs, including leading proprietary models, struggle with both static control and dynamic modulation of paralinguistic features, leading to significant errors in situational dialogue.
Current audio-language models are surprisingly bad at controlling and interpreting subtle vocal cues, failing in nearly half of situational dialogue scenarios.
Paralinguistic cues are essential for natural human-computer interaction, yet their evaluation in Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) remains limited by coarse feature coverage and the inherent subjectivity of assessment. To address these challenges, we introduce SpeechParaling-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for paralinguistic-aware speech generation. It expands existing coverage from fewer than 50 to over 100 fine-grained features, supported by more than 1,000 English-Chinese parallel speech queries, and is organized into three progressively challenging tasks: fine-grained control, intra-utterance variation, and context-aware adaptation. To enable reliable evaluation, we further develop a pairwise comparison pipeline, in which candidate responses are evaluated against a fixed baseline by an LALM-based judge. By framing evaluation as relative preference rather than absolute scoring, this approach mitigates subjectivity and yields more stable and scalable assessments without costly human annotation. Extensive experiments reveal substantial limitations in current LALMs. Even leading proprietary models struggle with comprehensive static control and dynamic modulation of paralinguistic features, while failure to correctly interpret paralinguistic cues accounts for 43.3% of errors in situational dialogue. These findings underscore the need for more robust paralinguistic modeling toward human-aligned voice assistants.
