Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a two-index anchor-and-resume framework for freight negotiation that adapts to dynamic pricing while ensuring monotonicity in offers. By deriving a flexible shape parameter $β$ from the live spread, the method allows for rapid concessions in narrow spreads and competitive savings in broader ones, outperforming traditional fixed-$β$ approaches. Empirical results from over 115,000 negotiations demonstrate that this framework achieves high agreement rates and savings, even when competing against advanced LLM-powered brokers and stochastic carriers.
A novel framework ensures that freight negotiations remain competitive and compliant with pricing dynamics, achieving high agreement rates without sacrificing decision transparency.
Freight brokerages negotiate thousands of carrier rates daily under dynamic pricing conditions where models frequently revise targets mid-conversation. Classical time-dependent concession frameworks use a fixed shape parameter $β$ that cannot adapt to these updates. Deriving $β$ from the live spread enables adaptation but introduces a new problem: a pricing shift can cause the formula to retract a previous offer, violating monotonicity. LLM-powered brokers offer flexibility but require expensive reasoning models, produce non-deterministic pricing, and remain vulnerable to prompt injection. We propose a two-index anchor-and-resume framework that addresses both limitations. A spread-derived $β$ maps each load's margin structure to the correct concession posture, while the anchor-and-resume mechanism guarantees monotonically non-decreasing offers under arbitrary pricing shifts. All pricing decisions remain in a deterministic formula; the LLM, when used, serves only as a natural-language translation layer. Empirical evaluation across 115,125 negotiations shows that the adaptive $β$ tailors behavior by regime: in narrow spreads, it concedes quickly to prioritize deal closure and load coverage; in medium and wide spreads, it matches or exceeds the best fixed-$β$ baselines in broker savings. Against an unconstrained 20-billion-parameter LLM broker, it achieves similar agreement rates and savings. Against LLM-powered carriers as more realistic stochastic counterparties, it maintains comparable savings and higher agreement rates than against rule-based opponents. By decoupling the LLM from pricing logic, the framework scales horizontally to thousands of concurrent negotiations with negligible inference cost and transparent decision-making.
