Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the disconnect between stuttered-speech research and the needs of end-users by conducting a scoping review of the literature and a survey of 70 stakeholders (adults who stutter and speech-language pathologists). The analysis reveals a significant divergence between current research priorities and the practical needs of the stuttering community, particularly in speech recognition performance and evaluation methods. Based on these findings, the authors propose a taxonomy of stuttered-speech research and offer concrete guidelines to better align future research with real-world needs.
Stuttered-speech research is missing the mark: a new study reveals a significant mismatch between current research priorities and the actual needs of people who stutter.
Atypical speech is receiving greater attention in speech technology research, but much of this work unfolds with limited interdisciplinary dialogue. For stuttered speech in particular, it is widely recognised that current speech recognition systems fall short in practice, and current evaluation methods and research priorities are not systematically grounded in end-user experiences and needs. In this work, we analyse these gaps through 1) a scoping review of papers that deal with stuttered speech and 2) a survey of 70 stakeholders, including adults who stutter and speech-language pathologists. By analysing these two perspectives, we propose a taxonomy of stuttered-speech research, identify where current research directions diverge from the needs articulated by stakeholders, and conclude by outlining concrete guidelines and directions towards addressing the real needs of the stuttering community.
