Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RAPIDDS, a framework for human-robot teaming that jointly adapts task schedules and robot motions by modeling an individual's spatial and temporal behavior over multiple interaction cycles. RAPIDDS uses these individualized models to optimize task allocation and steer diffusion models of robot motions, improving efficiency and minimizing proximity. User studies (n=32) demonstrate that RAPIDDS significantly improves plan performance compared to non-adaptive systems across objective metrics (efficiency, proximity) and subjective measures (fluency, user preference).
Human-robot teams get a fluency boost: RAPIDDS learns your quirks and preferences over time, adapting both task schedules and robot motions for smoother, more efficient collaboration.
Effective human-robot teaming is crucial for the practical deployment of robots in human workspaces. However, optimizing joint human-robot plans remains a challenge due to the difficulty of modeling individualized human capabilities and preferences. While prior research has leveraged the multi-cycle structure of domains like manufacturing to learn an individual's tendencies and adapt plans over repeated interactions, these techniques typically consider task-level and motion-level adaptation in isolation. Task-level methods optimize allocation and scheduling but often ignore spatial interference in close-proximity scenarios; conversely, motion-level methods focus on collision avoidance while ignoring the broader task context. This paper introduces RAPIDDS, a framework that unifies these approaches by modeling an individual's spatial behavior (motion paths) and temporal behavior (time required to complete tasks) over multiple cycles. RAPIDDS then jointly adapts task schedules and steers diffusion models of robot motions to maximize efficiency and minimize proximity accounting for these individualized models. We demonstrate the importance of this dual adaptation through an ablation study in simulation and a physical robot scenario using a 7-DOF robot arm. Finally, we present a user study (n=32) showing significant plan improvement compared to non-adaptive systems across both objective metrics, such as efficiency and proximity, and subjective measures, including fluency and user preference. See this paper's companion video at: https://youtu.be/55Q3lq1fINs.
