Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for evaluating the utility of synthetic trajectory generators and demonstrates a membership inference attack against a class of generative models previously considered private. The utility framework provides a structured approach to assess the quality of generated mobility data for downstream tasks. The membership inference attack reveals vulnerabilities in these models, even when they are resistant to trajectory user-linking attacks.
Generative models for mobility data, previously thought to be private, are vulnerable to membership inference attacks, highlighting the need for more robust privacy evaluations.
Human mobility data are used in numerous applications, ranging from public health to urban planning. Human mobility is inherently sensitive, as it can contain information such as religious beliefs and political affiliations. Historically, it has been proposed to modify the information using techniques such as aggregation, obfuscation, or noise addition, to adequately protect privacy and eliminate concerns. As these methods come at a great cost in utility, new methods leveraging development in generative models, were introduced. The extent to which such methods answer the privacy-utility trade-off remains an open problem. In this paper, we introduced a first step towards solving it, by the introduction and application of a new framework for utility evaluation. Furthermore, we provide evidence that privacy evaluation remains a great challenge to consider and that it should be tackled through adversarial evaluation in accordance with the current EU regulation. We propose a new membership inference attack against a subcategory of generative models, even though this subcategory was deemed private due to its resistance over the trajectory user-linking problem.
