Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the tension between open and commercial approaches to scholarly knowledge infrastructure, arguing that a functional "innovation annulus" exists between freely available metadata and commercially refined knowledge products. It posits that AI is reshaping this annulus by lowering barriers to basic structuring while raising the threshold for value-added refinement, introducing risks via unprovenanced AI-derived metadata. The authors propose a welfare framework for calibrating this annulus through governance mechanisms like the Barcelona Declaration, balancing research efficiency and innovation.
Open vs. closed debates miss the point: AI is fundamentally reshaping the economics of research metadata, creating new risks and opportunities that require careful governance of the space between free data and commercial products.
The debate about scholarly knowledge infrastructure has long been framed as a contest between openness and commercial enclosure. This framing distorts both policy and practice. The real tension lies between the persistent cost of producing and refining structured metadata under deep technological friction, and the differentiated demands distinct communities place on data quality, focus and granularity. We introduce the innovation annulus: the zone between freely available structured data and the advancing frontier of commercially refined knowledge products. This zone is a permanent, functional feature of the ecosystem -- not a pathology to eliminate. By analogy with the efficient market hypothesis, its width measures production inefficiency, set by the interplay of friction and demand. Artificial intelligence reshapes the annulus, lowering barriers to basic structuring, raising the threshold at which refinement adds value, and introducing systemic risks through unprovenanced AI-derived metadata. CRediT contributions, funding acknowledgements and AI disclosure statements illustrate the annulus lifecycle. Governance should calibrate the annulus, not abolish it: thin enough to serve research efficiently, wide enough to sustain innovation. A formal welfare framework, analogous to the Nordhaus optimal patent life, characterises the trade-offs and yields testable predictions. The Barcelona Declaration offers a promising forum for boundary governance.
