Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces DeepRed, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on Capture The Flag (CTF) challenges within isolated virtualized environments, providing a realistic offensive security setting. They propose a partial-credit scoring method based on challenge-specific checkpoints and an automated summarization-then-judgement pipeline to assess agent progress. Benchmarking ten commercially available LLMs reveals that the best model achieves only 35% average checkpoint completion, highlighting limitations in non-standard discovery and long-horizon adaptation.
LLM agents are surprisingly inept at Capture The Flag challenges, with even the best models only completing 35% of checkpoints, revealing a significant gap in their ability to perform realistic offensive security tasks.
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly proposed for autonomous cybersecurity tasks, but their capabilities in realistic offensive settings remain poorly understood. We present DeepRed, an open-source benchmark for evaluating LLM-based agents on realistic Capture The Flag (CTF) challenges in isolated virtualized environments. DeepRed places an agent in a Kali attacker environment with terminal tools and optional web search, connected over a private network to a target challenge, and records full execution traces for analysis. To move beyond binary solved/unsolved outcomes, we introduce a partial-credit scoring method based on challenge-specific checkpoints derived from public writeups, together with an automated summarise-then-judge labelling pipeline for assigning checkpoint completion from logs. Using DeepRed, we benchmark ten commercially accessible LLMs on ten VM-based CTF challenges spanning different challenge categories. The results indicate that current agents remain limited: the best model achieves only 35% average checkpoint completion, performing strongest on common challenge types and weakest on tasks requiring non-standard discovery and longer-horizon adaptation.
