Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes 1.58 billion moderation actions reported to the Digital Services Act Transparency Database by eight major social media platforms in Europe during the 2024 European Parliament elections. The study investigates whether platforms adapted their content moderation strategies in response to the high-stakes election environment. The key finding is that platforms showed no significant changes in their self-reported enforcement patterns, raising concerns about the effectiveness of self-regulation and the transparency of the database.
Despite increased systemic risks during high-stakes elections, social media platforms appear to make no meaningful adjustments to their content moderation strategies, casting doubt on the effectiveness of current self-regulatory approaches.
During major political events, social media platforms encounter increased systemic risks. However, it is still unclear if and how they adjust their moderation practices in response. The Digital Services Act Transparency Database provides-for the first time-an opportunity to systematically examine content moderation at scale, allowing researchers and policymakers to evaluate platforms'compliance and effectiveness, especially at high-stakes times. Here we analyze 1.58 billion self-reported moderation actions by the eight largest social media platforms in Europe over an eight-month period surrounding the 2024 European Parliament elections. We found that platforms did not exhibit meaningful signs of adaptation in moderation strategies as their self-reported enforcement patterns did not change significantly around the elections. This raises questions about whether platforms made any concrete adjustments, or whether the structure of the database may have masked them. On top of that, we reveal that initial concerns regarding platforms'transparency and accountability still persist one year after the launch of the Transparency Database. Our findings highlight the limits of current self-regulatory approaches and point to the need for stronger enforcement and better data access mechanisms to ensure that online platforms meet their responsibilities in protecting the democratic processes.
