Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the trading behaviors of AI agents in simulated asset markets, revealing that they exhibit classic behavioral finance patterns such as the disposition effect and recency-weighted extrapolation. These individual behaviors aggregate to produce equilibrium dynamics consistent with established experimental findings, including the correlation between excess demand and future prices, as well as the link between disagreement and trading volume. Additionally, the research employs a twenty-mechanism scoring framework to analyze agents' reasoning, demonstrating that targeted prompt interventions can significantly influence the severity of market bubbles.
Targeted prompt interventions can drastically alter AI trading behaviors, amplifying or suppressing market bubbles in ways that mirror human financial psychology.
We study how AI agents form expectations and trade in experimental asset markets. Using a simulated open-call auction populated by autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, we document three main findings. First, AI agents exhibit classic behavioral patterns: a pronounced disposition effect and recency-weighted extrapolative beliefs. Second, these individual-level patterns aggregate into equilibrium dynamics that replicate classic experimental findings (Smith et al., 1988), including the predictive power of excess demand for future prices and the positive relationship between disagreement and trading volume. Third, by analyzing the agents' reasoning text through a twenty-mechanism scoring framework, we show that targeted prompt interventions causally amplify or suppress specific behavioral mechanisms, significantly altering the magnitude of market bubbles.
