Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how language models identify and encode the importance of reasoning steps in their activations, revealing that model internals provide richer insights than surface-level token analysis. By training probes on model activations, the authors demonstrate that models possess an internal representation of step importance that generalizes across different architectures and is distributed across layers. Notably, this representation does not correlate with superficial features like step position or length, highlighting the need to focus on model internals for a deeper understanding of reasoning processes.
Model activations reveal a hidden layer of reasoning importance that surface-level analyses completely overlook.
Language models often solve complex tasks by generating long reasoning chains, consisting of many steps with varying importance. While some steps are crucial for generating the final answer, others are removable. Determining which steps matter most, and why, remains an open question central to understanding how models process reasoning. We investigate if this question is best approached through model internals or through tokens of the reasoning chain itself. We find that model activations contain more information than tokens for identifying important reasoning steps. Crucially, by training probes on model activations to predict importance, we show that models encode an internal representation of step importance, even prior to the generation of subsequent steps. This internal representation of importance generalizes across models, is distributed across layers, and does not correlate with surface-level features, such as a step's relative position or its length. Our findings suggest that analyzing activations can reveal aspects of reasoning that surface-level approaches fundamentally miss, indicating that reasoning analyses should look into model internals.
