Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a layerwise fairness analysis of self-supervised speech encoder models (S3Ms) to investigate the technological underpinnings of bias against certain speaker groups (SGs) in speaker identification (SID) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) tasks. The findings reveal that bias against specific SGs emerges from the very first latent layers of the models, with contrasting bias patterns observed between SID and ASR tasks. Notably, while SID bias decreases in layers optimized for SID performance, ASR bias increases in layers optimized for ASR, indicating that SG-level biases are entrenched during pretraining and resistant to mitigation through finetuning.
Bias against certain speaker groups is embedded in self-supervised speech models from the very first layers, complicating efforts to achieve fairness in speech recognition tasks.
Speech encoder models are known to model members of some speaker groups (SGs) better than others. However, there has been little work in establishing why this occurs on a technological level. To our knowledge, we present the first layerwise fairness analysis of pretrained self-supervised speech encoder models (S3Ms), probing each embedding layer for speaker identification (SID) automatic speech recognition (ASR). We find S3Ms produce embeddings biased against certain SGs for both tasks, starting at the very first latent layers. Furthermore, we find opposite patterns of layerwise bias for SID vs ASR for all models in our study: SID bias is minimized in layers that minimize overall SID error; on the other hand, ASR bias is maximized in layers that minimize overall ASR error. The inverse bias/error relationship for ASR is unaffected when probing S3Ms that are finetuned for ASR, suggesting SG-level bias is established during pretraining and is difficult to remove.
