Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a benchmark and evaluation pipeline for assessing the geometric accuracy of neural rendering methods like NeRF and Gaussian Splatting, addressing the limitations of relying solely on visual quality metrics. They evaluate surface and shape fidelity across 19 diverse scenes, providing a systematic comparison of reconstruction methods. Their results highlight the importance of considering geometric accuracy, especially in robotics applications where precise 3D models are crucial.
Visual quality isn't everything: this benchmark reveals the stark differences in geometric accuracy between neural rendering methods, crucial for robotics applications.
Recent advances in neural rendering have introduced numerous 3D scene representations. Although standard computer vision metrics evaluate the visual quality of generated images, they often overlook the fidelity of surface geometry. This limitation is particularly critical in robotics, where accurate geometry is essential for tasks such as grasping and object manipulation. In this paper, we present an evaluation pipeline for neural rendering methods that focuses on geometric accuracy, along with a benchmark comprising 19 diverse scenes. Our approach enables a systematic assessment of reconstruction methods in terms of surface and shape fidelity, complementing traditional visual metrics.
