Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing notion of Universality in representational alignment between artificial neural networks (ANNs) and biological brains, arguing that such alignment is a product of shared ecological constraints rather than convergence toward a singular optimal representation. The authors introduce the Umwelt Representation Hypothesis (URH), which emphasizes the systematic and adaptive differences in representations across species and individuals, challenging the idea of a universal model. By reframing model comparison in terms of ecological constraint spaces, the study offers a new perspective on how ANNs and biological systems align in their representations of reality.
Representational alignment in AI and biology may stem from shared ecological constraints, not a universal optimal model.
Recent studies reveal striking representational alignment between artificial neural networks (ANNs) and biological brains, leading to proposals that all sufficiently capable systems converge on universal representations of reality. Here, we argue that this claim of Universality is premature. We introduce the Umwelt Representation Hypothesis (URH), proposing that alignment arises not from convergence toward a single global optimum, but from overlap in ecological constraints under which systems develop. We review empirical evidence showing that representational differences between species, individuals, and ANNs are systematic and adaptive, which is difficult to reconcile with Universality. Finally, we reframe ANN model comparison as a method for mapping clusters of alignment in ecological constraint space rather than searching for a single optimal world model.
