Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This chapter provides a conceptual framework for understanding generative AI systems by decomposing them into interacting components: data, models, product features, and user inputs. It argues that the mismatch between user expectations and the statistical, data-driven nature of these systems causes confusion. By framing generative AI within the traditions of educational and behavioral research, the chapter positions educational researchers to effectively study, evaluate, and utilize these technologies.
Generative AI's "black box" nature isn't a bug, it's a feature stemming from a fundamental mismatch between user expectations and the technology's statistical foundations.
Generative AI systems have entered everyday academic, professional, and personal life with remarkable speed, yet most users encounter them as mysterious artifacts rather than intelligible systems. This chapter discusses large language models within a broader historical shift in computing paradigms and argues that many of the confusions surrounding their use arise from a mismatch between how these systems are built, how they behave, and how people expect computers to behave writ large. Rather than treating generative AI as a monolithic technology, the chapter decomposes it into interacting components, spanning data, models, product features, and user inputs, each introducing distinct affordances and tensions. Particular attention is given to the statistical and data-based foundations of these systems and to the fact that their surface behavior is explicitly human-like, a combination that places them squarely within the intellectual traditions of educational and behavioral research. From this perspective, educational researchers are unusually well positioned to study, evaluate, and productively use generative AI systems, drawing on established methods for modeling latent processes, managing uncertainty, and interpreting complex human-system interactions. The goal is to equip readers with a conceptual map that supports more informed experimentation, critical interpretation, and responsible use as these systems continue to evolve.
