Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a geometric stability metric, Shesha, to quantify the directional coherence of single-cell responses to CRISPR perturbations, revealing that cells can exhibit similar magnitude of perturbation effects while moving along different trajectories in expression space. Analyzing over 2,200 perturbations across five datasets, the authors find a strong correlation between stability and effect magnitude, with discordant cases shedding light on regulatory architecture and the roles of master regulators versus lineage-specific factors. The findings suggest that geometric instability is linked to increased cellular stress, providing a new dimension for evaluating perturbation effects in genetic screens and cell manufacturing.
Cells can exhibit large perturbation effects while moving incoherently, revealing hidden regulatory architectures that impact cellular stress responses.
Genome engineering has achieved remarkable sequence-level precision, yet predicting the transcriptomic state that a cell will occupy after perturbation remains an open problem. Single-cell CRISPR screens measure how far cells move from their unperturbed state, but this effect magnitude ignores a fundamental question: do the cells move together? Two perturbations with identical magnitude can produce qualitatively different outcomes if one drives cells coherently along a shared trajectory while the other scatters them across expression space. We introduce a geometric stability metric, Shesha, that quantifies the directional coherence of single-cell perturbation responses as the mean cosine similarity between individual cell shift vectors and the mean perturbation direction. Across five CRISPR datasets (2,200+ perturbations spanning CRISPRa, CRISPRi, and pooled screens), stability correlates strongly with effect magnitude (Spearman 蟻=0.75-0.97), with a calibrated cross-dataset correlation of 0.97. Crucially, discordant cases where the two metrics decouple expose regulatory architecture: pleiotropic master regulators such as CEBPA and GATA1 pay a "geometric tax," producing large but incoherent shifts, while lineage-specific factors such as KLF1 produce tightly coordinated responses. After controlling for magnitude, geometric instability is independently associated with elevated chaperone activation (HSPA5/BiP; 蟻_{partial}=-0.34 and -0.21 across datasets), and the high-stability/high-stress quadrant is systematically depleted. The magnitude-stability relationship persists in scGPT foundation model embeddings, confirming it is a property of biological state space rather than linear projection. Perturbation stability provides a complementary axis for hit prioritization in screens, phenotypic quality control in cell manufacturing, and evaluation of in silico perturbation predictions.
