Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces a synthetic shortest-path planning environment to study generalization in LLMs, separating the effects of training data, paradigms, and inference strategies. They find strong spatial transfer to unseen maps but consistent failure in length scaling due to recursive instability. The authors analyze how data coverage, reinforcement learning, and inference-time scaling each contribute to or limit systematic problem-solving within this environment.
LLMs that ace shortest-path planning on small maps completely fall apart when asked to plan routes just a little bit longer.
Whether language models can systematically generalize remains actively debated. Yet empirical performance is jointly shaped by multiple factors such as training data, training paradigms, and inference-time strategies, making failures difficult to interpret. We introduce a controlled synthetic environment based on shortest-path planning, a canonical composable sequential optimization problem. The setup enables clean separation of these factors and supports two orthogonal axes of generalization: spatial transfer to unseen maps and length scaling to longer-horizon problems. We find that models exhibit strong spatial transfer but consistently fail under length scaling due to recursive instability. We further analyze how distinct stages of the learning pipeline influence systematic problem-solving: for example, data coverage sets capability limits; reinforcement learning improves training stability but does not expand those limits; and inference-time scaling enhances performance but cannot rescue length-scaling failures.
NUS