Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Interrogative Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ), a framework for quantifying uncertainty in long-form LLM generation by assessing both inter-sample consistency and intra-sample faithfulness. IUQ uses an "interrogate-then-respond" approach to evaluate claim-level uncertainty and model faithfulness by prompting the LLM to answer targeted questions about its own generated text. Experiments across various models and datasets demonstrate that IUQ outperforms existing methods in providing reliable uncertainty estimates for long-form outputs.
LLMs can now tell you how unsure they are about their long-form answers, thanks to a new interrogation-based uncertainty metric that actually works.
Despite the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), uncertainty quantification in LLM generation is a persistent challenge. Although recent approaches have achieved strong performance by restricting LLMs to produce short or constrained answer sets, many real-world applications require long-form and free-form text generation. A key difficulty in this setting is that LLMs often produce responses that are semantically coherent yet factually inaccurate, while the underlying semantics are multifaceted and the linguistic structure is complex. To tackle this challenge, this paper introduces Interrogative Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ), a novel framework that leverages inter-sample consistency and intra-sample faithfulness to quantify the uncertainty in long-form LLM outputs. By utilizing an interrogate-then-respond paradigm, our method provides reliable measures of claim-level uncertainty and the model's faithfulness. Experimental results across diverse model families and model sizes demonstrate the superior performance of IUQ over two widely used long-form generation datasets. The code is available at https://github.com/louisfanhz/IUQ.