Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a scoping review of 23 studies on fairness in multi-agent AI (MAAI) systems, revealing that current approaches often lack depth, normative grounding, and consideration of agent autonomy. The authors identify five archetypal approaches to fairness in MAAI and find that fairness is often treated as an afterthought rather than an integral design consideration. The review emphasizes the need for human oversight, normative clarity, and precise articulation of fairness objectives to advance fairness research in MAAI.
Fairness in multi-agent AI is more of an afterthought than a core design principle, leaving critical gaps in addressing agent autonomy and system-level interactions.
Rapid advances in Generative AI are giving rise to increasingly sophisticated Multi-Agent AI (MAAI) systems. While AI fairness has been extensively studied in traditional predictive scenarios, its examination in MAAI remains nascent and fragmented. This scoping review critically synthesizes existing research on fairness in MAAI systems. Through a qualitative content analysis of 23 selected studies, we identify five archetypal approaches. Our findings reveal that fairness in MAAI systems is often addressed superficially, lacks robust normative foundations, and frequently overlooks the complex dynamics introduced by agent autonomy and system-level interactions. We argue that fairness must be embedded structurally throughout the development lifecycle of MAAI, rather than appended as a post-hoc consideration. Meaningful evaluation requires explicit human oversight, normative clarity, and a precise articulation of fairness objectives and beneficiaries. This review provides a foundation for advancing fairness research in MAAI systems by highlighting critical gaps, exposing prevailing limitations, and suggesting pathways.
