Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
LongCoT, a new benchmark, directly measures long-horizon chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning capabilities by requiring models to navigate graphs of interdependent steps spanning tens to hundreds of thousands of reasoning tokens across diverse domains. Current frontier models like GPT-4 and Gemini Pro achieve less than 10% accuracy on LongCoT, highlighting a significant gap in long-horizon reasoning. The benchmark's design, where each step is individually tractable, isolates failures to limitations in managing extended reasoning chains.
Today's best LLMs fail spectacularly at long-horizon reasoning, achieving under 10% accuracy on a new benchmark designed to isolate this critical capability.
As language models are increasingly deployed for complex autonomous tasks, their ability to reason accurately over longer horizons becomes critical. An essential component of this ability is planning and managing a long, complex chain-of-thought (CoT). We introduce LongCoT, a scalable benchmark of 2,500 expert-designed problems spanning chemistry, mathematics, computer science, chess, and logic to isolate and directly measure the long-horizon CoT reasoning capabilities of frontier models. Problems consist of a short input with a verifiable answer; solving them requires navigating a graph of interdependent steps that span tens to hundreds of thousands of reasoning tokens. Each local step is individually tractable for frontier models, so failures reflect long-horizon reasoning limitations. At release, the best models achieve <10% accuracy (GPT 5.2: 9.8%; Gemini 3 Pro: 6.1%) on LongCoT, revealing a substantial gap in current capabilities. Overall, LongCoT provides a rigorous measure of long-horizon reasoning, tracking the ability of frontier models to reason reliably over extended periods.
