Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper proves that equivalence is undecidable for higher-order polyregular functions, which are based on a 位-calculus definition of polyregular functions. The proof relies on a reduction from the tiling problem, demonstrating the inherent complexity of reasoning about equivalence in this higher-order setting. This result contrasts with the open question of decidability for first-order string-to-string polyregular functions.
Forget about checking equivalence for higher-order polyregular functions鈥攊t's undecidable.
It is open whether equivalence ( f = g ) is decidable for string-to-string polyregular functions. We consider their higher-order extension based on the 位-calculus definition of polyregular functions from Boja艅czyk (2018). In this setting, equivalence is undecidable by reduction from the tiling problem.
