Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
BankerToolBench (BTB) is introduced as a new open-source benchmark for evaluating AI agents in end-to-end investment banking workflows, requiring navigation of data rooms, usage of industry tools, and generation of multi-file deliverables. The benchmark was developed in collaboration with 502 investment bankers to ensure ecological validity and representative work environments. Evaluation of 9 frontier models on BTB reveals that even the best model, GPT-5.4, fails nearly half of the rubric criteria, with 0% of outputs rated as client-ready, highlighting key obstacles in cross-artifact consistency for agentic AI.
Even GPT-5.4 can't handle investment banking tasks, failing nearly half the criteria and producing zero client-ready outputs on a new benchmark designed with 500+ bankers.
Existing AI benchmarks lack the fidelity to assess economically meaningful progress on professional workflows. To evaluate frontier AI agents in a high-value, labor-intensive profession, we introduce BankerToolBench (BTB): an open-source benchmark of end-to-end analytical workflows routinely performed by junior investment bankers. To develop an ecologically valid benchmark grounded in representative work environments, we collaborated with 502 investment bankers from leading firms. BTB requires agents to execute senior banker requests by navigating data rooms, using industry tools (market data platform, SEC filings database), and generating multi-file deliverables--including Excel financial models, PowerPoint pitch decks, and PDF/Word reports. Completing a BTB task takes bankers up to 21 hours, underscoring the economic stakes of successfully delegating this work to AI. BTB enables automated evaluation of any LLM or agent, scoring deliverables against 100+ rubric criteria defined by veteran investment bankers to capture stakeholder utility. Testing 9 frontier models, we find that even the best-performing model (GPT-5.4) fails nearly half of the rubric criteria and bankers rate 0% of its outputs as client-ready. Our failure analysis reveals key obstacles (such as breakdowns in cross-artifact consistency) and improvement directions for agentic AI in high-stakes professional workflows.
