Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper identifies a critical flaw in multimodal reasoning models trained with RLVR: improved accuracy often comes at the expense of reasoning quality, with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces being inconsistent and poorly grounded in visual evidence. To address this, they introduce Faithful GRPO (FGRPO), a variant of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) that enforces consistency and grounding as constraints via Lagrangian dual ascent. Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL models across seven spatial datasets demonstrate that FGRPO substantially improves reasoning quality and final answer accuracy.
Multimodal models may ace the test, but their reasoning is often a sham: FGRPO makes them explain their answers in a way that actually makes sense.
Multimodal reasoning models (MRMs) trained with reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) show improved accuracy on visual reasoning benchmarks. However, we observe that accuracy gains often come at the cost of reasoning quality: generated Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces are frequently inconsistent with the final answer and poorly grounded in the visual evidence. We systematically study this phenomenon across seven challenging real-world spatial reasoning benchmarks and find that it affects contemporary MRMs such as ViGoRL-Spatial, TreeVGR as well as our own models trained with standard Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We characterize CoT reasoning quality along two complementary axes:"logical consistency"(does the CoT entail the final answer?) and"visual grounding"(does each reasoning step accurately describe objects, attributes, and spatial relationships in the image?). To address this, we propose Faithful GRPO (FGRPO), a variant of GRPO that enforces consistency and grounding as constraints via Lagrangian dual ascent. FGRPO incorporates batch-level consistency and grounding constraints into the advantage computation within a group, adaptively adjusting the relative importance of constraints during optimization. We evaluate FGRPO on Qwen2.5-VL-7B and 3B backbones across seven spatial datasets. Our results show that FGRPO substantially improves reasoning quality, reducing the inconsistency rate from 24.5% to 1.7% and improving visual grounding scores by +13%. It also improves final answer accuracy over simple GRPO, demonstrating that faithful reasoning enables better answers.
