Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This chapter analyzes the impact of US-China geopolitical rivalry on inclusive AI innovation by comparing data privacy, IP rights, and export restrictions in both countries. It argues that while China benefits from data access and IP protection, the US leverages export controls on semiconductors, AI models, and outbound investments. The analysis reveals how this rivalry fosters exclusionary rulemaking globally, impacting the trajectory of AI development.
The US-China AI race isn't just about algorithms; it's a legal chess match where data access and IP protection clash with export controls, shaping who wins and who's left out.
This chapter examines the impact of the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China on the prospects for inclusive innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) development. We explore three critical aspects of the American and Chinese legal infrastructure that significantly impact AI innovation: data privacy, intellectual property (IP rights), and export restrictions. Through this comparative analysis, we argue that, while China's legal environment may offer certain advantage in terms of access to training data and IP protection, the United States maintains superior resources by enforcing strict export controls on semiconductor chips, AI models, as well as outbound investments in these areas. This nuanced examination helps illuminate how each country's legal framework could influence the ultimate trajectory of AI race and how the technological rivalry has led to exclusionary rulemaking on a global scale.
