Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates whether SNIP, a multi-modal Latent Space Optimization (LSO) method for symbolic regression that aligns symbolic and numeric encoders, achieves effective cross-modal alignment during optimization. Through experiments, the authors find that cross-modal alignment in SNIP does not improve during optimization, and the learned alignment is too coarse for effective symbolic search. This reveals a gap between the promise of multi-modal LSO and its current realization, emphasizing the need for fine-grained alignment strategies.
Multi-modal alignment in symbolic regression models like SNIP doesn't actually improve during optimization, suggesting current approaches are too coarse to effectively guide symbolic search.
Symbolic regression (SR) aims to discover mathematical expressions from data, a task traditionally tackled using Genetic Programming (GP) through combinatorial search over symbolic structures. Latent Space Optimization (LSO) methods use neural encoders to map symbolic expressions into continuous spaces, transforming the combinatorial search into continuous optimization. SNIP (Meidani et al., 2024), a contrastive pre-training model inspired by CLIP, advances LSO by introducing a multi-modal approach: aligning symbolic and numeric encoders in a shared latent space to learn the phenotype-genotype mapping, enabling optimization in the numeric space to implicitly guide symbolic search. However, this relies on fine-grained cross-modal alignment, whereas literature on similar models like CLIP reveals that such an alignment is typically coarse-grained. In this paper, we investigate whether SNIP delivers on its promise of effective bi-modal optimization for SR. Our experiments show that: (1) cross-modal alignment does not improve during optimization, even as fitness increases, and (2) the alignment learned by SNIP is too coarse to efficiently conduct principled search in the symbolic space. These findings reveal that while multi-modal LSO holds significant potential for SR, effective alignment-guided optimization remains unrealized in practice, highlighting fine-grained alignment as a critical direction for future work.