Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces U-CECE, a multi-resolution framework for concept-based counterfactual explanations that balances expressivity and efficiency by representing concepts as atomic sets, relational sets-of-sets, or structural graphs. The framework offers both transductive (GNN-based) and inductive (GAE-based) modes for structural representations, adapting to different data regimes and computational budgets. Experiments on CUB and Visual Genome datasets, along with human and LLM evaluations, demonstrate that U-CECE's structural counterfactuals are semantically equivalent to, and sometimes preferred over, GED-based ground truth.
Concept-based counterfactual explanations no longer need to choose between speed and accuracy: U-CECE dynamically adjusts the complexity of concept representations to provide the best explanation for the available compute.
As AI models grow more complex, explainability is essential for building trust, yet concept-based counterfactual methods still face a trade-off between expressivity and efficiency. Representing underlying concepts as atomic sets is fast but misses relational context, whereas full graph representations are more faithful but require solving the NP-hard Graph Edit Distance (GED) problem. We propose U-CECE, a unified, model-agnostic multi-resolution framework for conceptual counterfactual explanations that adapts to data regime and compute budget. U-CECE spans three levels of expressivity: atomic concepts for broad explanations, relational sets-of-sets for simple interactions, and structural graphs for full semantic structure. At the structural level, both a precision-oriented transductive mode based on supervised Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and a scalable inductive mode based on unsupervised graph autoencoders (GAEs) are supported. Experiments on the structurally divergent CUB and Visual Genome datasets characterize the efficiency-expressivity trade-off across levels, while human surveys and LVLM-based evaluation show that the retrieved structural counterfactuals are semantically equivalent to, and often preferred over, exact GED-based ground-truth explanations.
