Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces EditCaption, a two-stage post-training pipeline to improve VLM-based instruction synthesis for image editing by addressing orientation inconsistency, viewpoint ambiguity, and insufficient attribute description. The pipeline involves supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a 100K dataset built with automatic annotation, EditScore filtering, and human refinement, followed by direct preference optimization (DPO) using 10K human preference pairs. Experiments show that fine-tuned Qwen3-VL models using EditCaption outperform existing baselines, achieving state-of-the-art results on Eval-400 and ByteMorph-Bench, while significantly reducing critical errors in generated instructions.
Turns out, you can cut critical errors in VLM-generated image editing instructions in half with a clever two-stage training pipeline, leading to SOTA editing performance.
High-quality training triplets (source-target image pairs with precise editing instructions) are a critical bottleneck for scaling instruction-guided image editing models. Vision-language models (VLMs) are widely used for automated instruction synthesis, but we identify three systematic failure modes in image-pair settings: orientation inconsistency (e.g., left/right confusion), viewpoint ambiguity, and insufficient fine-grained attribute description. Human evaluation shows that over 47% of instructions from strong baseline VLMs contain critical errors unusable for downstream training. We propose EditCaption, a scalable two-stage post-training pipeline for VLM-based instruction synthesis. Stage 1 builds a 100K supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset by combining GLM automatic annotation, EditScore-based filtering, and human refinement for spatial, directional, and attribute-level accuracy. Stage 2 collects 10K human preference pairs targeting the three failure modes and applies direct preference optimization (DPO) for alignment beyond SFT alone. On Eval-400, ByteMorph-Bench, and HQ-Edit, fine-tuned Qwen3-VL models outperform open-source baselines; the 235B model reaches 4.712 on Eval-400 (vs. Gemini-3-Pro 4.706, GPT-4.1 4.220, Kimi-K2.5 4.111) and 4.588 on ByteMorph-Bench (vs. Gemini-3-Pro 4.522, GPT-4.1 3.412). Human evaluation shows critical errors falling from 47.75% to 23% and correctness rising from 41.75% to 66%. The work offers a practical path to scalable, human-aligned instruction synthesis for image editing data.
Tsinghua AI