Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the architectural evolution of State-Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba, showing how optimizations for hyperscale GPU throughput in Mamba-3 have inadvertently sacrificed efficiency on edge devices. They find that Mamba-3's changes lead to a 28-48% latency increase on edge devices compared to earlier versions, despite theoretical linear complexity. The authors advocate for decoupling cloud-scale and edge-native design principles to maintain the benefits of SSMs for real-time edge applications.
Mamba's quest for hyperscale GPU saturation has backfired, making it significantly slower on edge devices despite its theoretical efficiency.
The Hardware Lottery posits that research directions are dictated by available silicon compute platforms. We identify a derivative phenomenon, the Hyperscale Lottery, where model architectures are optimized for cloud throughput at the expense of algorithmic efficiency. While State-Space Models (SSMs) such as Mamba were lauded for their linear complexity, ideal for edge intelligence, their evolution from Mamba-1 to Mamba-3 reveals a systematic divergence from edge-native efficiency. We demonstrate that Mamba-3's architectural changes, designed to saturate hyperscale GPUs, impose a significant edge penalty: a 28% latency increase at 880M parameters, worsening to 48% for 15M-parameter models. We argue for decoupling cloud-scale saturation strategies from core architectural design to preserve the viability of single-user, real-time edge intelligence.
Stanford HAI