Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper performs a large-scale analysis of 50,000 robotics papers from arXiv to quantify the prevalence of sustainability considerations in the field. They find that while many robotics papers are relevant to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), explicit mentions of sustainability impacts and motivations remain surprisingly low (below 5%). The study highlights a significant "sustainability gap" between the potential of robotics and its current framing, calling for concrete actions to promote more responsible innovation.
Despite the clear potential for robotics to advance sustainability, less than 5% of robotics papers explicitly address sustainability impacts, revealing a critical disconnect.
We present a large-scale survey of sustainability communication and motivation in robotics research. Our analysis covers nearly 50,000 open-access papers from arXiv's cs.RO category published between 2015 and early 2026. In this study, we quantify how often papers mention social, ecological, and sustainability impacts, and we analyse their alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The results reveal a persistent gap between the field's potential and its stated intent. While a large fraction of robotics papers can be mapped to SDG-relevant domains, explicit sustainability motivation remains remarkably low. Specifically, mentions of sustainability-related impacts are typically below 2%, explicit SDG references stay below 0.1%, and the proportion of sustainability-motivated papers remains below 5%. These trends suggest that while the field of robotics is advancing rapidly, sustainability is not yet a standard part of research framing. We conclude by proposing concrete actions for researchers, conferences, and institutions to close these awareness and motivation gaps, supporting a shift toward more intentional and responsible innovation.
