Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces TEMPER-5400, a benchmark of 5,400 emotion-neutral math problem pairs, to test the impact of emotional framing on LLM quantitative reasoning. They find that emotional framing degrades accuracy by 2-10 percentage points across GSM8K, MultiArith, and ARC-Challenge, even when numerical content is preserved. Furthermore, neutralizing the emotional variants recovers most of the lost performance, suggesting emotional style, rather than content corruption, is the primary cause of degradation.
LLMs' math skills are more fragile than we thought: emotional language alone can throw off their reasoning by up to 10%.
Large language models are trained and evaluated on quantitative reasoning tasks written in clean, emotionally neutral language. However, real-world queries are often wrapped in frustration, urgency or enthusiasm. Does emotional framing alone degrade reasoning when all numerical content is preserved? To investigate this, a controlled emotion translation framework is developed that rewrites problems into emotional variants while preserving all quantities and relationships. Using this framework, Temper-5400 (5,400 semantically verified emotion--neutral pairs) is constructed across GSM8K, MultiArith, and ARC-Challenge, and evaluated on eighteen models (1B to frontier scale). Two core results emerge: First, emotional framing reduces accuracy by 2-10 percentage points even though all numerical content is preserved. Second, neutralizing emotional variants recovers most of the lost performance, showing both that the degradation is tied to emotional style rather than content corruption and that neutralization can serve as a lightweight inference-time mitigation. Non-emotional paraphrases cause no such degradation, implicating emotional content rather than surface-level changes. Beyond emotion specifically, the benchmark construction procedure provides a general framework for controlled stylistic translation and robustness evaluation.
