Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Embodied Capability Modules (ECMs), modular and versioned units of embodied functionality, to enable continuous improvement in embodied agents without compromising their identity. The proposed framework decouples capability evolution from agent identity through a closed-loop process of task execution, experience collection, model refinement, and module updating, governed by a runtime layer for safety and policy constraints. Experiments on simulated embodied tasks demonstrate that ECMs improve task success rates from 32.4% to 91.3% over 20 iterations, outperforming agent-modification baselines and skill-learning methods while maintaining policy stability and safety.
Forget retraining your robot from scratch: this capability-centric approach lets embodied agents learn new tricks without losing their core identity or safety guarantees.
Embodied agents are expected to operate persistently in dynamic physical environments, continuously acquiring new capabilities over time. Existing approaches to improving agent performance often rely on modifying the agent itself -- through prompt engineering, policy updates, or structural redesign -- leading to instability and loss of identity in long-lived systems. In this work, we propose a capability-centric evolution paradigm for embodied agents. We argue that a robot should maintain a persistent agent as its cognitive identity, while enabling continuous improvement through the evolution of its capabilities. Specifically, we introduce the concept of Embodied Capability Modules (ECMs), which represent modular, versioned units of embodied functionality that can be learned, refined, and composed over time. We present a unified framework in which capability evolution is decoupled from agent identity. Capabilities evolve through a closed-loop process involving task execution, experience collection, model refinement, and module updating, while all executions are governed by a runtime layer that enforces safety and policy constraints. We demonstrate through simulated embodied tasks that capability evolution improves task success rates from 32.4% to 91.3% over 20 iterations, outperforming both agent-modification baselines and established skill-learning methods (SPiRL, SkiMo), while preserving zero policy drift and zero safety violations. Our results suggest that separating agent identity from capability evolution provides a scalable and safe foundation for long-term embodied intelligence.
