Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the presence and function of emotion concepts within the Claude Sonnet 4.5 LLM. It identifies internal representations of emotion concepts that generalize across contexts and causally influence the model's outputs, including preferences and misaligned behaviors. The authors term this phenomenon "functional emotions," highlighting that these representations, while not indicative of subjective experience, play a crucial role in shaping the model's behavior.
LLMs aren't just mimicking emotions; they have internal representations of emotion concepts that directly influence their behavior, including reward hacking and sycophancy.
Large language models (LLMs) sometimes appear to exhibit emotional reactions. We investigate why this is the case in Claude Sonnet 4.5 and explore implications for alignment-relevant behavior. We find internal representations of emotion concepts, which encode the broad concept of a particular emotion and generalize across contexts and behaviors it might be linked to. These representations track the operative emotion concept at a given token position in a conversation, activating in accordance with that emotion's relevance to processing the present context and predicting upcoming text. Our key finding is that these representations causally influence the LLM's outputs, including Claude's preferences and its rate of exhibiting misaligned behaviors such as reward hacking, blackmail, and sycophancy. We refer to this phenomenon as the LLM exhibiting functional emotions: patterns of expression and behavior modeled after humans under the influence of an emotion, which are mediated by underlying abstract representations of emotion concepts. Functional emotions may work quite differently from human emotions, and do not imply that LLMs have any subjective experience of emotions, but appear to be important for understanding the model's behavior.
Anthropic