Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces SYN-DIGITS, a post-processing calibration framework for LLM-based digital twin simulations, designed to mitigate biases and improve alignment with real human behavior. SYN-DIGITS leverages synthetic control methods and learns latent structures from digital twin responses to transfer and align predictions with human ground truth. Empirical evaluations across diverse settings demonstrate that SYN-DIGITS achieves significant improvements in both individual-level correlation and distributional discrepancy compared to uncalibrated LLM baselines, with provable error guarantees.
LLM-based digital twins can be made 50-90% more accurate with a lightweight calibration framework inspired by causal inference.
AI-based persona simulation -- often referred to as digital twin simulation -- is increasingly used for market research, recommender systems, and social sciences. Despite their flexibility, large language models (LLMs) often exhibit systematic bias and miscalibration relative to real human behavior, limiting their reliability. Inspired by synthetic control methods from causal inference, we propose SYN-DIGITS (SYNthetic Control Framework for Calibrated DIGItal Twin Simulation), a principled and lightweight calibration framework that learns latent structure from digital-twin responses and transfers it to align predictions with human ground truth. SYN-DIGITS operates as a post-processing layer on top of any LLM-based simulator and thus is model-agnostic. We develop a latent factor model that formalizes when and why calibration succeeds through latent space alignment conditions, and we systematically evaluate ten calibration methods across thirteen persona constructions, three LLMs, and two datasets. SYN-DIGITS supports both individual-level and distributional simulation for previously unseen questions and unobserved populations, with provable error guarantees. Experiments show that SYN-DIGITS achieves up to 50% relative improvements in individual-level correlation and 50--90% relative reductions in distributional discrepancy compared to uncalibrated baselines.
