Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces T-STAR, a reinforcement learning framework that addresses sparse rewards in multi-turn reasoning tasks by constructing a "Cognitive Tree" to model correlated reward structures across trajectories. T-STAR uses this tree to perform introspective valuation, backpropagating trajectory-level rewards to obtain step-level advantages, and employs in-context thought grafting to synthesize corrective reasoning. Experiments across various benchmarks demonstrate that T-STAR consistently outperforms strong baselines, especially in tasks requiring extended reasoning chains, by focusing policy optimization on critical steps.
By distilling successful and failed reasoning paths into a "Cognitive Tree," T-STAR pinpoints and corrects critical errors in multi-turn reasoning, leading to significant performance gains.
Reinforcement learning for Large Language Model agents is often hindered by sparse rewards in multi-step reasoning tasks. Existing approaches like Group Relative Policy Optimization treat sampled trajectories as independent chains, assigning uniform credit to all steps in each chain and ignoring the existence of critical steps that may disproportionally impact reasoning outcome. In this paper, we propose T-STAR(Tree-structured Self-Taught Agent Rectification), a framework that recovers the latent correlated reward structure across seemingly independent trajectories. Specifically, we consolidate trajectories into a unified Cognitive Tree by identifying and merging functionally similar steps/nodes. It enables an Introspective Valuation mechanism that back-propagates trajectory-level rewards through the tree to obtain a new notion of variance-reduced relative advantage at step-level. Using the Cognitive Tree, we also develop In-Context Thought Grafting to synthesize corrective reasoning by contrasting successful and failed branches at critical divergence points/steps. Our proposed Surgical Policy Optimization then capitalizes on the rich policy gradient information concentrated at these critical points/steps through a Bradley-Terry type of surgical loss. Extensive experiments across embodied, interactive, reasoning, and planning benchmarks demonstrate that T-STAR achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines, with gains most pronounced on tasks requiring extended reasoning chains.
