Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reframes Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) as a sequential decision-making problem, where an agent learns to strategically use tools like image retrieval, text retrieval, and captioning to gather relevant information. They create an automated pipeline to generate multi-step trajectories of agent actions, providing supervision for fine-tuning. Experiments on InfoSeek and E-VQA show state-of-the-art results, demonstrating the effectiveness of learning a search strategy for KB-VQA.
Forget fixed pipelines: training an agent to *learn* when and how to search for knowledge dramatically improves performance on knowledge-based visual question answering.
Knowledge-based visual question answering (KB-VQA) requires vision-language models to understand images and use external knowledge, especially for rare entities and long-tail facts. Most existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods adopt a fixed pipeline that sequentially retrieves information, filters it, and then produces an answer. Such a design makes it difficult to adapt to diverse question types. Moreover, it separates retrieval from reasoning, making it hard for the model to decide when to search, how to refine queries, or when to stop. As a result, the retrieved evidence is often poorly aligned with the question. To address these limitations, we reformulate KB-VQA as a search-agent problem and model the solving process as a multi-step decision-making procedure. At each step, the agent selects one of four actions-Answer, Image Retrieval, Text Retrieval, and Caption-based on its current information state. We further design an automated pipeline to collect multi-step trajectories that record the agent's reasoning process, tool usage, and intermediate decisions. These trajectories are then used as supervision for fine-tuning. Experiments on InfoSeek and E-VQA demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming prior baselines and confirming the effectiveness of our framework.