Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces log coverage metrics (average, min, max) to evaluate REST API test generation strategies in black-box settings, addressing the challenge of assessing test effectiveness without source code access. They empirically compare Evolutionary computing (EvoMaster), LLMs (Claude Opus, GPT-5.2-Codex), and human-written Locust load tests on the Light-OAuth2 microservice, using the proposed log coverage metrics. Results show Claude Opus outperforms human-written tests by 28.4% in unique log template coverage, while combining different strategies reveals significant complementarity in exercising distinct runtime behaviors.
Claude Opus can generate REST API tests that uncover 28% more unique log templates than human-written tests, suggesting LLMs can surpass human intuition in exploring API runtime behavior.
Assessing the effectiveness of REST API tests in black-box settings can be challenging due to the lack of access to source code coverage metrics and polyglot tech stack. We propose three metrics for capturing average, minimum, and maximum log coverage to handle the diverse test generation results and runtime behaviors over multiple runs. Using log coverage, we empirically evaluate three REST API test generation strategies, Evolutionary computing (EvoMaster v5.0.2), LLMs (Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2-Codex), and human-written Locust load tests, on Light-OAuth2 authorization microservice system. On average, Claude Opus 4.6 tests uncover 28.4% more unique log templates than human-written tests, whereas EvoMaster and GPT-5.2-Codex find 26.1% and 38.6% fewer, respectively. Next, we analyze combined log coverage to assess complementarity between strategies. Combining human-written tests with Claude Opus 4.6 tests increases total observed log coverage by 78.4% and 38.9% in human-written and Claude tests respectively. When combining Locust tests with EvoMaster the same increases are 30.7% and 76.9% and when using GPT-5.2-Codex 26.1% and 105.6%. This means that the generation strategies exercise largely distinct runtime behaviors. Our future work includes extending our study to multiple systems.
