Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper extends the DeGroot model to analyze how AI aggregators, trained on population beliefs, affect social learning. The key finding is a threshold in the aggregator's update speed: rapid updates prevent robust learning improvements across diverse environments, while slower updates allow for beneficial training weights. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that local, specialized aggregators consistently enhance learning, suggesting that replacing them with a single global aggregator can degrade performance.
Global AI aggregators can actually *worsen* learning compared to specialized, local ones, especially when they update too quickly.
Artificial intelligence (AI) changes social learning when aggregated outputs become training data for future predictions. To study this, we extend the DeGroot model by introducing an AI aggregator that trains on population beliefs and feeds synthesized signals back to agents. We define the learning gap as the deviation of long-run beliefs from the efficient benchmark, allowing us to capture how AI aggregation affects learning. Our main result identifies a threshold in the speed of updating: when the aggregator updates too quickly, there is no positive-measure set of training weights that robustly improves learning across a broad class of environments, whereas such weights exist when updating is sufficiently slow. We then compare global and local architectures. Local aggregators trained on proximate or topic-specific data robustly improve learning in all environments. Consequently, replacing specialized local aggregators with a single global aggregator worsens learning in at least one dimension of the state.
