Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a new benchmark for evaluating spoken language models performing multi-step tool use in realistic, full-duplex voice interactions with human speech disfluencies. The benchmark dataset comprises real human audio annotated for disfluencies across four task domains, enabling evaluation of accuracy, latency, and turn-taking. Experiments comparing GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live, Grok, Ultravox, and a cascaded Whisper-GPT-4o-TTS pipeline reveal tradeoffs between accuracy, latency, and turn-taking, while highlighting persistent challenges in handling self-corrections and multi-step reasoning.
Real-world speech disfluencies trip up even the most advanced full-duplex voice agents, exposing critical gaps in self-correction and multi-step reasoning abilities.
We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use. Unlike prior work, our dataset consists entirely of real human audio annotated for five disfluency categories, paired with scenarios requiring chained API calls across four task domains. We evaluate six model configurations -- GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live 2.5, Gemini Live 3.1, Grok, Ultravox v0.7, and a traditional Cascaded pipeline (Whisper$\rightarrow$GPT-4o$\rightarrow$TTS) -- across accuracy, latency, and turn-taking dimensions. GPT-Realtime leads on Pass@1 (0.600) and interruption avoidance (13.5\%); Gemini Live 3.1 achieves the fastest latency (4.25~s) but the lowest turn-take rate (78.0\%); and the Cascaded baseline, despite a perfect turn-take rate, incurs the highest latency (10.12~s). Across all systems, self-correction handling and multi-step reasoning under hard scenarios remain the most consistent failure modes.
