Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes failure modes in agentic information retrieval (IR) systems, highlighting how seemingly fluent language can mask underlying errors in planning, retrieval, reasoning, and execution that compound over long-horizon trajectories. It argues that current evaluation focuses too much on endpoint accuracy and neglects the importance of trajectory integrity and causal attribution. The authors propose incorporating verification gates at each step and systematic abstention based on calibrated uncertainty to improve the reliability of agentic IR.
Fluent language from an agentic IR system can be dangerously deceptive, masking critical errors in planning, retrieval, reasoning, and execution that accumulate over time.
Information Retrieval is shifting from passive document ranking toward autonomous agentic workflows that operate in multi-step Reason-Act-Observe loops. In such long-horizon trajectories, minor early errors can cascade, leading to functional misalignment between internal reasoning and external tool execution despite continued linguistic fluency. This position paper synthesizes failure modes observed in industrial agentic systems, categorizing errors across planning, retrieval, reasoning, and execution. We argue that safe deployment requires moving beyond endpoint accuracy toward trajectory integrity and causal attribution. To address compounding error and deceptive fluency, we propose verification gates at each interaction unit and advocate systematic abstention under calibrated uncertainty. Reliable Agentic IR systems must prioritize process correctness and grounded execution over plausible but unverified completion.
Google Research