Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates structural biases in LLMs towards American English (AmE) over British English (BrE) by analyzing pretraining corpora, tokenizers, and generative outputs. They introduce DiAlign, a training-free method for estimating dialectal alignment using distributional evidence. Results show a systematic skew towards AmE in pretraining data, higher segmentation costs for BrE tokens, and a persistent AmE preference in model generations, highlighting a significant structural bias.
LLMs exhibit a measurable preference for American English due to skewed pretraining data, inefficient tokenization of British English, and biased generative outputs.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet they expose only limited language settings, most notably "English (US)," despite the global diversity and colonial history of English. Through a postcolonial framing to explain the broader significance, we investigate how geopolitical histories of data curation, digital dominance, and linguistic standardization shape the LLM development pipeline. Focusing on two dominant standard varieties, American English (AmE) and British English (BrE), we construct a curated corpus of 1,813 AmE--BrE variants and introduce DiAlign, a dynamic, training-free method for estimating dialectal alignment using distributional evidence. We operationalize structural bias by triangulating evidence across three stages: (i) audits of six major pretraining corpora reveal systematic skew toward AmE, (ii) tokenizer analyses show that BrE forms incur higher segmentation costs, and (iii) generative evaluations show a persistent AmE preference in model outputs. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic and multi-faceted examination of dialectal asymmetries in standard English varieties across the phases of LLM development. We find that contemporary LLMs privilege AmE as the de facto norm, raising concerns about linguistic homogenization, epistemic injustice, and inequity in global AI deployment, while motivating practical steps toward more dialectally inclusive language technologies.
