Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces ClawArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents' ability to maintain accurate beliefs in dynamic, multi-source information environments. ClawArena features scenarios with noisy, partial, and contradictory information across multiple channels, workspace files, and staged updates, organized around multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization. Experiments across five agent frameworks and five language models reveal that both model capability and framework design significantly impact performance, and that belief revision difficulty depends on update strategy.
Current AI agents struggle to maintain accurate beliefs in evolving information environments, with performance varying significantly based on both model capability (15.4% range) and framework design (9.2%).
AI agents deployed as persistent assistants must maintain correct beliefs as their information environment evolves. In practice, evidence is scattered across heterogeneous sources that often contradict one another, new information can invalidate earlier conclusions, and user preferences surface through corrections rather than explicit instructions. Existing benchmarks largely assume static, single-authority settings and do not evaluate whether agents can keep up with this complexity. We introduce ClawArena, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in evolving information environments. Each scenario maintains a complete hidden ground truth while exposing the agent only to noisy, partial, and sometimes contradictory traces across multi-channel sessions, workspace files, and staged updates. Evaluation is organized around three coupled challenges: multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization, whose interactions yield a 14-category question taxonomy. Two question formats, multi-choice (set-selection) and shell-based executable checks, test both reasoning and workspace grounding. The current release contains 64 scenarios across 8 professional domains, totaling 1{,}879 evaluation rounds and 365 dynamic updates. Experiments on five agent frameworks and five language models show that both model capability (15.4% range) and framework design (9.2%) substantially affect performance, that self-evolving skill frameworks can partially close model-capability gaps, and that belief revision difficulty is determined by update design strategy rather than the mere presence of updates. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/ClawArena.
