Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides a structured review of agentic tool use in LLMs, categorizing existing approaches into prompting, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning paradigms. It analyzes the methods, strengths, and weaknesses of each paradigm, highlighting the fragmented nature of current research. The review culminates in a discussion of key challenges and future directions for advancing agentic tool use in LLMs.
The chaos of LLM tool use research gets tamed: a new framework reveals the hidden evolutionary relationships between prompting, supervised learning, and RL-based approaches.
Large language models are increasingly being deployed as autonomous agents yet their real world effectiveness depends on reliable tools for information retrieval, computation and external action. Existing studies remain fragmented across tasks, tool types, and training settings, lacking a unified view of how tool-use methods differ and evolve. This paper organizes the literature into three paradigms: prompting as plug-and-play, supervised tool learning and reward-driven tool policy learning, analyzes their methods, strengths and failure modes, reviews the evaluation landscape and highlights key challenges, aiming to address this fragmentation and provide a more structured evolutionary view of agentic tool use.
