Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the transformative impact of artificial superintelligence (ASI) on the legal system, positing that ASI agents will evolve into subjects, consumers, and producers of law. It argues that ASI's autonomy and cognitive superiority will challenge fundamental legal assumptions rooted in human origins and necessitate a re-evaluation of legal theory and doctrine. The paper concludes that lawmakers must proactively adapt legal institutions to accommodate ASI, acknowledging the potential for a collaborative human-AI legal framework in the future.
Superintelligence will not just be regulated by law, but will actively use and shape it, forcing us to rethink legal theory's human-centric foundations.
The prospect of artificial superintelligence鈥擜I agents that can generally outperform humans in cognitive tasks and economically valuable activities鈥攚ill transform the legal order as we know it. Operating autonomously or under only limited human oversight, AI agents will assume a growing range of roles in the legal system. First, in making consequential decisions and taking real-world actions, AI agents will become de facto subjects of law. Second, to cooperate and compete with other actors (human or non-human), AI agents will harness conventional legal instruments and institutions such as contracts and courts, becoming consumers of law. Third, to the extent AI agents perform the functions of writing, interpreting, and administering law, they will become producers and enforcers of law. These developments, whenever they ultimately occur, will call into question fundamental assumptions in legal theory and doctrine, especially to the extent they ground the legitimacy of legal institutions in their human origins. Attempts to align AI agents with extant human law will also face new challenges as AI agents will not only be a primary target of law, but a core user of law and contributor to law. To contend with the advent of superintelligence, lawmakers鈥攏ew and old鈥攚ill need to be clear-eyed, recognizing both the opportunity to shape legal institutions as society braces for superintelligence and the reality that, in the longer run, this may be a joint human-AI endeavor.