Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a Bayesian optimization framework for preference-based many-objective optimization that learns a mixture model of latent preference archetypes using a Dirichlet process. By modeling heterogeneous, context-dependent human value structures, the framework addresses the challenges of expanding trade-off spaces in many-objective optimization. The proposed method, guided by hybrid queries targeting mode identity and within-mode trade-offs, outperforms standard baselines on synthetic and real-world benchmarks while also providing interpretable mixture-aware diagnostics.
Stop assuming a single utility function: modeling preferences as a mixture of archetypes unlocks better Bayesian optimization in complex, many-objective spaces.
Preference-based many-objective optimization faces two obstacles: an expanding space of trade-offs and heterogeneous, context-dependent human value structures. Towards this, we propose a Bayesian framework that learns a small set of latent preference archetypes rather than assuming a single fixed utility function, modelling them as components of a Dirichlet-process mixture with uncertainty over both archetypes and their weights. To query efficiently, we designing hybrid queries that target information about (i) mode identity and (ii) within-mode trade-offs. Under mild assumptions, we provide a simple regret guarantee for the resulting mixture-aware Bayesian optimization procedure. Empirically, our method outperforms standard baselines on synthetic and real-world many-objective benchmarks, and mixture-aware diagnostics reveal structure that regret alone fails to capture.
